Intent data has become a cornerstone of modern ABM strategies. Companies use it to identify accounts actively researching solutions, then time their outreach to match buying intent. But intent data providers vary widely in coverage, accuracy, and integration options. This guide compares two leading platforms: G2 and Bombora, so you can choose the right intent data partner for your ABM program.
Intent data signals that a prospect or account is researching a solution in your category. Common intent signals include:
Intent data is valuable because it tells you not just who to target (firmographics), but when to target them. Timing matters in sales. Reaching out to an account actively evaluating solutions converts better than cold outreach to unqualified accounts.
G2 is the world's largest software review platform. Companies visit G2 to research software products before buying. G2 intent data captures this research behavior.
G2's Strengths: - Massive Coverage: Hundreds of millions of buying professionals visit G2 monthly - High-Intent Signals: Visitors are actively researching software, not just browsing - Category Clarity: You can see which product categories accounts are researching - Transparent Tracking: G2 intent signals come from named, verifiable sources
G2's Limitations: - Software-Focused: G2 data is strongest for SaaS and software companies. B2B services, hardware, and non-software verticals see less coverage. - No Account Expansion: G2 data shows which accounts are researching solutions but doesn't identify expansion opportunities within existing customers. - Late-Stage Focus: G2 visitors are usually in evaluation or late-stage buying. Early-stage awareness signals are missing. - Integration Complexity: Getting G2 intent data into your CRM and ABM platform requires custom integrations or third-party middleware.
Bombora aggregates intent signals from a network of B2B publishers, content platforms, and web properties. When a business professional visits one of Bombora's partner sites and shows interest in a topic, Bombora captures that signal.
Bombora's Strengths: - Broad Coverage: Bombora's publisher network is extensive, covering more verticals and industries than G2 alone - Multi-Stage Buying Signals: Bombora captures intent across awareness, consideration, and evaluation stages - Account and Contact Resolution: You get both account-level and individual contact-level intent signals - Native Integrations: Bombora integrates natively with ABM platforms, CRMs, and marketing automation tools - Privacy-Compliant: Bombora's methodology doesn't rely on personally identifiable information (PII), making it privacy-forward
Bombora's Limitations: - Data Quality Variation: Bombora's signal quality depends on publisher quality. Not all signals are equally weighted. - B2C Bleed: Some intent signals come from B2C sites, requiring filtering to focus on B2B buying behavior - Cost at Scale: Intent data licensing grows with consumption and account coverage, making it expensive for large TALs
| Feature | G2 Intent Data | Bombora |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage (B2B Professionals) | 500M+ monthly visitors | Broad publisher network |
| Intent Signal Stages | Mostly evaluation-stage | Awareness through evaluation |
| Account Resolution | Limited | Strong |
| Contact-Level Signals | Limited | Yes |
| Vertical Strength | SaaS/Software | Multi-vertical (B2B focused) |
| Integration Ease | Requires custom work | Native to ABM platforms |
| Privacy Compliance | PII-based tracking | Privacy-forward |
| Pricing Model | Per-signal or per-account | Per-account or consumption-based |
| Historical Data | Recent signals only | 12-24 month historical lookback |
Using intent data well can improve ABM performance by 30-50%. Here's how:
Improved Account Prioritization: Instead of targeting all companies matching your ICP, you prioritize accounts actively researching your category. This narrows your focus to high-intent prospects.
Better Timing: You reach out when buying intent is peaking, not randomly. This increases conversation rates and shortens sales cycles.
Competitive Win Rates: Intent data reveals which competitors accounts are evaluating. Your sales team can proactively position against competitors.
Reduced Wasted Spend: Advertising spend on accounts with no buying intent wastes budget. Intent data focuses ad spend on accounts actively researching.
Some mature ABM programs use both G2 and Bombora intent data simultaneously. Here's why:
Complementary Coverage: G2 is strongest for SaaS buying signals, while Bombora covers broader B2B verticals. Together, they provide more complete coverage.
Multi-Signal Confidence: If an account shows intent on both G2 and Bombora, confidence in the buying signal increases. You're more likely to engage.
Full-Funnel Signals: G2 captures evaluation-stage intent, while Bombora picks up earlier awareness-stage signals. Combined, you get the full buying journey.
Risk: Doubling up on intent data providers increases cost without proportional benefit for smaller TALs (under 500 accounts).
Here's where many teams get stuck: they buy intent data from G2 or Bombora but lack a platform to act on it.
The Problem: - Intent data is delivered as lists or CSV exports - Your team manually updates CRM fields with intent signals - Sales and marketing don't see the same signals in their workflow - By the time someone acts on the data, intent has cooled (buying windows are 2-4 weeks)
The Solution: Integrate intent data with an ABM platform that automates the response. When an account shows buying intent, the platform automatically:
Abmatic is built to act on intent signals in real-time. Here's how:
Native Intent Integration: Abmatic integrates with G2, Bombora, and other intent providers. Intent signals feed directly into your account prioritization and engagement workflows.
Real-Time Alerts: When an account shows buying intent, sales and marketing teams are alerted immediately. No missed windows.
Coordinated Response: Abmatic orchestrates a coordinated response across email, LinkedIn, ads, and sales. One intent signal triggers a coordinated sequence, not random outreach.
Attribution Clarity: You see which intent signals correlate with pipeline. Over time, you learn which signals are strongest for your sales cycle, and you can weight them accordingly.
Cost Efficiency: Abmatic's per-account model means you pay for the accounts you want to target, not for consumed intent signals. Intent data is included, so there are no surprise licensing fees.
Without ABM Platform: 1. Buy intent data 2. Export signals to CRM 3. Teams manually create campaigns 4. Track results in CRM (if they remember to log) 5. Limited attribution, unclear ROI
With Abmatic: 1. Activate intent data (built-in integrations) 2. Define engagement workflows (visual builder, no coding) 3. Orchestration happens automatically 4. Real-time visibility into results 5. Clear attribution, measurable ROI
Q: Which intent data provider should we use, G2 or Bombora? A: It depends on your industry. If you're selling SaaS to software buyers, G2 is strong. If you sell to enterprises across industries, Bombora's broader coverage is better. Many teams use both.
Q: How accurate is intent data? A: Intent signals have false-positive rates of 20-30%. Some accounts show research signals but never enter a buying process. Use intent data to prioritize outreach, not as a guarantee of buying.
Q: Can we use intent data without an ABM platform? A: Yes, but ROI suffers. Intent windows are narrow (2-4 weeks), so you need real-time activation and coordination. Manual processes miss the window.
Q: How long does intent data take to drive pipeline? A: First deals typically close in 3-4 months, once you've coordinated engagement across intent-triggered accounts. Quick wins can appear in 6-8 weeks.
Q: What if we have a small TAL (under 100 accounts)? A: Intent data is less critical for small TALs because you're manually targeting a curated list anyway. Focus on personalization and timing first. Add intent data as you scale.
Q: Does intent data work for expansion and upsell? A: G2 and Bombora are mostly focused on new customer acquisition. Expansion intent (existing customers researching new product categories) requires different signals.
Ready to see Abmatic in action? Book a demo
Q: What is the main benefit of this approach? A: This approach helps B2B marketing teams focus resources on high-value accounts, improving pipeline efficiency and sales-marketing alignment.
Q: How long does implementation typically take? A: Most teams see initial results within 60-90 days, with full program maturity at 6-12 months depending on team size and existing tech stack.
Q: How do I measure success? A: Track account engagement rate, pipeline influenced by target accounts, and win rate among ABM-targeted accounts compared to non-targeted accounts.